Week 3

<classical argument outline>

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

- I will start by announcing that evolution has two meanings. One is for physiological human evolution which started from our ancestors and the other is for improvement in social skills, which occurred by individual. However, people tend to focus the meaning of evolution on the former one. Because many of people believe that while the human evolution from ape to Cro-Magnon is obvious, people can't achieve social evolution perfectly, due to their own limits to community, which are hard to be changed. By contrast, I think people can achieve social evolution perfectly, overcoming their own limits to community.

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

- I will describe the incidents of someone who were successful to achieve their own social evolution. And, one of the incidents is of Gandhi and the other are of Jeong ji hoon(alias : rain)'s and Nelson Mandela's.

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

- I will start by explaining the incidents of someone who were successful to improve their social skills, which will indicate that people can achieve their own social evolution perfectly. There are three incidents which will show how social evolution occurs apparently and indicate that people can improve their social skills, despite their own limits to community.


4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

- Even if individual has so significant willingness to overcome their limits to community, sometimes, society would not allow the individual to achieve social evolution.


5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

- I will close with a summary of my previous points, then indicate that the key to achieve social evolution is willingness, which is not relevant to social limitation. I will end with a reaffirmation of my original thesis.