Week 7

<narration>

My persuasive argument thesis is: Despite some social limitations, people achieve social evolution perfectly. 

1. What do people already know about my topic?

Everyone knows that there are some social limitations interrupting someone to achieve social evolution, such as the gap between rich and poor or racial discrimination or caste system.

2. What research has already been done about my topic?

These images are good for showing the caste system.

3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)

Like caste system, even if the society doesn't allow someone to achieve social evolution, people can overcome any social limitations with strong willingness to do so, like the case of Gandhi.

My Narration

Someone could have some social limitations which interrupt their social evolution. For instance, in India, there had been caste system. This system separated people into four levels, shudra, vaishya, kshatriya, and brahmin. Brahmin was the highest level, Kshatriya was the second one, Vaishya was the third one, and Shudra was the lowest one. This system led brahmin to have superiority and shudra to be treated with contempt. Therefore, Shudra and Vaishya were difficult to improve their social skills. However, Gandhi who was an Indian, Vaishya, was successful to achieve social evolution. He led to independence of India from United kingdom. The key was his strong willingness to achieve social evolution, despite his level, Vaishya. Therefore, I think that even if the society doesn't allow someone to achieve social evolution, people can overcome any social limitations with strong willingness to do so.