Week 3 

<articulating my argument>

1) My argument Write your argument in one sentence. Then, spend some time explaining it. 

I want to argue that people can achieve social evolution perfectly, by overcoming their limits to community. Many people believe that physiological evolution can occur to all of the humans obviously through a really long period, but social evolution isn't easy to occur to all of them, because society often doesn't allow someone to achieve social evolution, like social limitation.

2) How I found my argument Explain how your research helped you find your argument. Or, in other words, how did your research evolve into your argument? Start with your research question.

It seems that if there are some social limitation, such as caste system or gap between rich and poor or racial discrimination, people are hard to achieve social evolution perfectly. I will search the incidents of three persons who were successful to achieve social evolution perfectly despite their own social limitations.

3) New research questions What do you still need to know? What is your research plan?
I have several questions that need to be resolved.
a) What is the good incident to support my thesis.
b) What circumstances are people hard to achieve social evolution?
c) What is the key to achieve social evolution perfectly, despite social limitation.

4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler How is your argument connected to the Harvard Sampler? ANY CONNECTION IS VALID. Please focus on choosing a good argument first, then think about how it is related to the Harvard Sampler. I will help you think of the connection if necessary.

This argument has a connection to the Harvard Sampler ; Evolution. The Harvard Sampler focuses on the evidence of the physiological human evolution which takes a really long period. However, I focus on the social evolution by the individual. It will indicate the another meaning of 'Evolution'.